剧照
剧情介绍
亨利四世：第一部分美剧免费高清在线观看全集。
BBC2历史电视电影系列《空王冠》（The Hollow Crown）4部经典莎士比亚作品的新演绎，分别是：《理查二世》（Richard II）、《亨利四世：第一部》（Henry IV, Part 1）、《亨利四世：第二部》（Henry IV, Part 2）和《亨利五 世》（Henry V）。在2012年伦敦奥运会期间，为了向全世界展现英国文化，这四部电视电影将作为伦敦文化奥运的重点推荐剧目向全世界推行，在2012年6月播出。 《亨利四世》是该系列的第二部。夺取理查二世权势的亨利四世，将由奥斯卡影帝杰瑞米·艾恩斯 Jeremy Irons饰演，将由《丑闻纪事》的导演理查德·艾尔掌镜，在《复仇者联盟》中雷神弟弟“洛基”汤姆·希德勒斯顿 Tom Hiddleston将饰演Prince Hal，西蒙·拉塞尔·比尔 Simon Russell Beale饰...魂断花园中鲨卷风6：最后的鲨卷风 The Last Sharknado: It/s About Time小活佛危险的邂逅朋友圈灵异事件古见同学有交流障碍症708090之深圳恋歌初到香港爱猫人通天书院史丹利与爱莉丝BORDER赤沙印记美国处女茶馆2010回家的欲望救我爱是唯一1996荒岛求生之巨兽来袭关于路易莎晴日呖咕呖咕对对碰新海神号历险记灵偶契约大步向前走第一季一起露营吧第二季破晓2015梅兰芳明日传奇 第七季仙君有劫蛇岛狂蟒爱是永恒2016小井胡同通天古盒祭坛两小无知克隆谋杀（国语版）DP 逃兵追缉令 第二季绿色骑士西关大屋阿凡提之奇缘历险证明2022暴太郎战队咚兄弟电影版：新·初恋英雄
BBC2历史电视电影系列《空王冠》（The Hollow Crown）4部经典莎士比亚作品的新演绎，分别是：《理查二世》（Richard II）、《亨利四世：第一部》（Henry IV, Part 1）、《亨利四世：第二部》（Henry IV, Part 2）和《亨利五 世》（Henry V）。在2012年伦敦奥运会期间，为了向全世界展现英国文化，这四部电视电影将作为伦敦文化奥运的重点推荐剧目向全世界推行，在2012年6月播出。 《亨利四世》是该系列的第二部。夺取理查二世权势的亨利四世，将由奥斯卡影帝杰瑞米·艾恩斯 Jeremy Irons饰演，将由《丑闻纪事》的导演理查德·艾尔掌镜，在《复仇者联盟》中雷神弟弟“洛基”汤姆·希德勒斯顿 Tom Hiddleston将饰演Prince Hal，西蒙·拉塞尔·比尔 Simon Russell Beale饰...魂断花园中鲨卷风6：最后的鲨卷风 The Last Sharknado: It/s About Time小活佛危险的邂逅朋友圈灵异事件古见同学有交流障碍症708090之深圳恋歌初到香港爱猫人通天书院史丹利与爱莉丝BORDER赤沙印记美国处女茶馆2010回家的欲望救我爱是唯一1996荒岛求生之巨兽来袭关于路易莎晴日呖咕呖咕对对碰新海神号历险记灵偶契约大步向前走第一季一起露营吧第二季破晓2015梅兰芳明日传奇 第七季仙君有劫蛇岛狂蟒爱是永恒2016小井胡同通天古盒祭坛两小无知克隆谋杀（国语版）DP 逃兵追缉令 第二季绿色骑士西关大屋阿凡提之奇缘历险证明2022暴太郎战队咚兄弟电影版：新·初恋英雄
长篇影评
1 ) 抖森是我的人生导师，莎士比亚太赞
On the year of 2008, Olympic Game has been hold by England. For the sake of spreading England unique culture, which will also be beneficial to cross-cultural communication, BBC TV station has directed a series of film called Hollow Crown, which are some adapted works from Shakespeare’s history plays including RichardⅡ, HenryⅣ and HenryⅤ. To be honest, Henry Ⅳ is one of the greatest films I have ever watched.
Henry IV is a story about a king who stole the crown from his cousin, and is tormented by his guilt. Also, it's growing story about his son, a feckless young prince, who is always exposed to some blackguardly ruffians. However, when he suddenly is conscious of his father’s weighty responsibility and his massive burden, the prince, who seems to be cynicism, is forced to grow up and face his destiny. Then, on succeeding to the throne, the new young king takes his country to war, realizing he must assume his responsibility to strengthen national defense and fight against invaders. Eventually he becomes the greatest warrior king in English history.
In deep meaning, it's also an adventurous story of people facing an uncertain future, and of a country searching for a new sense of patriotic identity.
In this film, what deeply impresses me most is not father and son, but friendship and betrayal. In fact, this movie does not put emphasis on the relationship between HenryⅣ and his son HenryⅣ,but do stand out what happens between the young prince Hal and his so-called loyal friend Jack Falstaff. To some extend, the friendship and betrayal is the most dramatic aspect, running through the whole movie.
Jack Falstaff, as the leader of some ruffians, is almost paternal relationship with Hal, the young prince. Generally speaking, Falstaff is too much of a pretty crook, who is a congenital liar, congenital drunk as well as thief. However, Falstaff sets his affection on Hal, and the emotion shed by his eye really convince audiences that they own true friendship, conveying a message that even he is a ragtag, the prince still cherish their relationship.
However, that is totally wrong. Why Shakespeare is a most renowned writer, because everything that is Shakespearean is ambiguous. And in the most ambiguous but dramatically important scenes, Hal's split loyalties between Falstaff and his father of are central to both plays.①
Falstaff brings out the wayward and irresponsible side of Hal. However, the other side of the young prince's personality lies in this prince’s inherent essence. Although Hal seems like a terrible shit and he does some dreadful things, but in his inner world, he is a very upright person, he is also an ambitious and sophisticated politician.
I know you all, and will awhile uphold the unyoked humor of your idleness.
Yet herein will I imitate the sun, who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world.
That, when he please again be himself, being wanted, he may be more wondered at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him.③
The words from Hal’s mouth show his ambition, appearing in the beginning of the film, give us a warning.
So how could the writer, Shakespeare copes with this difficult problem? Why Shakespeare is being Shakespeare, because he solves it through a play within a play.
Prof.Jonathan Bate(Worcester College Oxford) claims that:
This fantastic scene, to my mind. Come on, I'll say it the greatest scene Shakespeare ever wrote.
This fantastic scene where they act out Prince Hal returning to court, being interviewed by his father.
It's an amazing piece of theatre, where you have Falstaff and Hal playing the parts of King Henry IV and Hal.②
In this play within play, Hal and Falstaff have an interesting pub game, they need to play the parts of King Henry IV and Hal, imitating a conversation between father and son.
As first, Falstaff play the role of Hal’s father, the present king, in the course of communication, Falstaff doesn't tell Hal to pull his royal socks up. Rather, he instructs the young prince to spend more time with a splendid fellow called Falstaff. Falstaff regards that he is a loyal and true friend around Hal. And sometimes, indeed, he is, at least many audience thinks so, including me.
Then, they change the position, Hal do an impression of his father, and Falstaff plays him. At the beginning, Hal pretends to be his father, being angry to interrogate his son, Falstaff, why he would play with a local ruffian. Later, Hal's perspective begins to change. He claims that his son Hal must banish his fat friend, Falstaff.
Then Falstaff say the most impressive words from his bottom of heart:
Banish plump Jack, and banish all the world.③
The emotion from their eye contacts reveals that they are all touched by these sincere sentences. Especially Hal, he moves to tears, totally smothering his tears from his eyes.
However, the Hal say these words:
I do.③
Again, he supplies another sentences:
I will.③
That is really strange.
When Hal says “I do.”, he is within the context of the play within the play, as the acting the part, in his father’s tone. But then, in that instant pause, and the shift of the verb tense “I will” disclosures that he is speaking not within the play within the play, but as himself.
He is giving Falstaff warning that the moment will come, when he becomes a real king, he need to banish Falstaff.
What happens to Hal, why he needs to say these serious words?
It is believed that if you know the play well, if you love the play and the adapted movie, you cannot watch it with a dry eye.
So at the end of that game, there is a chilling premonition, and that what appears in the ending of this movie.
Gold save the king.③
With these cheerful sentences, Hal is crowned in Westminster Abbey, and eventually becomes the king. Then in the parade, Falstaff deliberately happens to meet his heart, Hal. Falstaff want to claim kinship and let the king give him some advantages. However, the king changes his voice, he is strict with this fat man, saying the follow sentence:
My lord Chief Justice, speak to that vain man
I know thee not, old man. Fall to thy prayers. How ill white hairs become a fool and jester.
I have long dreamed of such a kind of man so surfeit-swelled, so old and so profane. But, being awake, I do despise my dream.
Make less thy body hence and more thy grace, leave gormandizing.
Know the grave doth gape for thee thrice wider than for other men. Reply not to me with a fool-born jest!
Presume not that I am the thing I was.
For God doth know, so shall the world perceive, that I have turned away my former self. So will I those that kept me company When thou dost hear I am as I have been, approach me and thou shalt be as thou wast, the tutor and the feeder of my riots.
Till then I banish thee, on pain of death
As I have done the rest of my misleaders, not to come near our person by ten mile. For competence of live I will allow you, the lack of means enforce you not to evil.
And, as we hear you do reform yourselves, we will, according to your strengths and qualities, give you advancement.④
That’s a very long monologue, but when Hal says these words. It is really powerful and awful. Does he totally forget the time Falstaff around him, like his father to care of him? Does he never remember the happy ages he enjoy his youth, not worrying his duty to take charge of a country?
So why he does that?
Hal is not to do this having a mater plan, he just has an idea of how he wants his life to go, he is aware of his responsibility, who knows the fun will have to end one day.
Therefore, both these acts speak volumes. Hal gets rid of formal himself,
And I think that is the most dramatic aspect of the whole movie. Making you so convincing that Falstaff and Hal is a pair of close friend, but the end reveals that they break down their relationship in this way. So amazing, is not it?
But the ending has its own premonition and reliable explanation. The most ambiguous part seems not so ambiguous, thanks to our greatest writer, Shakespeare.
Like the so-called “O. Henry-style ending”, disclosure when the movie ends the people of the psychological situation changes unexpectedly, or the fate of the hero suddenly reversed, giving audiences an unexpected result, but also be associated with real life, resulting in a unique artistic charm.
Reference:
①,② From: BBC Documentary: Shakespeare Uncovered_Jeremy Irons on the Henrys.
③ From: The movie: Henry IV
④ From: The Book: Henry IV
Henry IV is a story about a king who stole the crown from his cousin, and is tormented by his guilt. Also, it's growing story about his son, a feckless young prince, who is always exposed to some blackguardly ruffians. However, when he suddenly is conscious of his father’s weighty responsibility and his massive burden, the prince, who seems to be cynicism, is forced to grow up and face his destiny. Then, on succeeding to the throne, the new young king takes his country to war, realizing he must assume his responsibility to strengthen national defense and fight against invaders. Eventually he becomes the greatest warrior king in English history.
In deep meaning, it's also an adventurous story of people facing an uncertain future, and of a country searching for a new sense of patriotic identity.
In this film, what deeply impresses me most is not father and son, but friendship and betrayal. In fact, this movie does not put emphasis on the relationship between HenryⅣ and his son HenryⅣ,but do stand out what happens between the young prince Hal and his so-called loyal friend Jack Falstaff. To some extend, the friendship and betrayal is the most dramatic aspect, running through the whole movie.
Jack Falstaff, as the leader of some ruffians, is almost paternal relationship with Hal, the young prince. Generally speaking, Falstaff is too much of a pretty crook, who is a congenital liar, congenital drunk as well as thief. However, Falstaff sets his affection on Hal, and the emotion shed by his eye really convince audiences that they own true friendship, conveying a message that even he is a ragtag, the prince still cherish their relationship.
However, that is totally wrong. Why Shakespeare is a most renowned writer, because everything that is Shakespearean is ambiguous. And in the most ambiguous but dramatically important scenes, Hal's split loyalties between Falstaff and his father of are central to both plays.①
Falstaff brings out the wayward and irresponsible side of Hal. However, the other side of the young prince's personality lies in this prince’s inherent essence. Although Hal seems like a terrible shit and he does some dreadful things, but in his inner world, he is a very upright person, he is also an ambitious and sophisticated politician.
I know you all, and will awhile uphold the unyoked humor of your idleness.
Yet herein will I imitate the sun, who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world.
That, when he please again be himself, being wanted, he may be more wondered at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him.③
The words from Hal’s mouth show his ambition, appearing in the beginning of the film, give us a warning.
So how could the writer, Shakespeare copes with this difficult problem? Why Shakespeare is being Shakespeare, because he solves it through a play within a play.
Prof.Jonathan Bate(Worcester College Oxford) claims that:
This fantastic scene, to my mind. Come on, I'll say it the greatest scene Shakespeare ever wrote.
This fantastic scene where they act out Prince Hal returning to court, being interviewed by his father.
It's an amazing piece of theatre, where you have Falstaff and Hal playing the parts of King Henry IV and Hal.②
In this play within play, Hal and Falstaff have an interesting pub game, they need to play the parts of King Henry IV and Hal, imitating a conversation between father and son.
As first, Falstaff play the role of Hal’s father, the present king, in the course of communication, Falstaff doesn't tell Hal to pull his royal socks up. Rather, he instructs the young prince to spend more time with a splendid fellow called Falstaff. Falstaff regards that he is a loyal and true friend around Hal. And sometimes, indeed, he is, at least many audience thinks so, including me.
Then, they change the position, Hal do an impression of his father, and Falstaff plays him. At the beginning, Hal pretends to be his father, being angry to interrogate his son, Falstaff, why he would play with a local ruffian. Later, Hal's perspective begins to change. He claims that his son Hal must banish his fat friend, Falstaff.
Then Falstaff say the most impressive words from his bottom of heart:
Banish plump Jack, and banish all the world.③
The emotion from their eye contacts reveals that they are all touched by these sincere sentences. Especially Hal, he moves to tears, totally smothering his tears from his eyes.
However, the Hal say these words:
I do.③
Again, he supplies another sentences:
I will.③
That is really strange.
When Hal says “I do.”, he is within the context of the play within the play, as the acting the part, in his father’s tone. But then, in that instant pause, and the shift of the verb tense “I will” disclosures that he is speaking not within the play within the play, but as himself.
He is giving Falstaff warning that the moment will come, when he becomes a real king, he need to banish Falstaff.
What happens to Hal, why he needs to say these serious words?
It is believed that if you know the play well, if you love the play and the adapted movie, you cannot watch it with a dry eye.
So at the end of that game, there is a chilling premonition, and that what appears in the ending of this movie.
Gold save the king.③
With these cheerful sentences, Hal is crowned in Westminster Abbey, and eventually becomes the king. Then in the parade, Falstaff deliberately happens to meet his heart, Hal. Falstaff want to claim kinship and let the king give him some advantages. However, the king changes his voice, he is strict with this fat man, saying the follow sentence:
My lord Chief Justice, speak to that vain man
I know thee not, old man. Fall to thy prayers. How ill white hairs become a fool and jester.
I have long dreamed of such a kind of man so surfeit-swelled, so old and so profane. But, being awake, I do despise my dream.
Make less thy body hence and more thy grace, leave gormandizing.
Know the grave doth gape for thee thrice wider than for other men. Reply not to me with a fool-born jest!
Presume not that I am the thing I was.
For God doth know, so shall the world perceive, that I have turned away my former self. So will I those that kept me company When thou dost hear I am as I have been, approach me and thou shalt be as thou wast, the tutor and the feeder of my riots.
Till then I banish thee, on pain of death
As I have done the rest of my misleaders, not to come near our person by ten mile. For competence of live I will allow you, the lack of means enforce you not to evil.
And, as we hear you do reform yourselves, we will, according to your strengths and qualities, give you advancement.④
That’s a very long monologue, but when Hal says these words. It is really powerful and awful. Does he totally forget the time Falstaff around him, like his father to care of him? Does he never remember the happy ages he enjoy his youth, not worrying his duty to take charge of a country?
So why he does that?
Hal is not to do this having a mater plan, he just has an idea of how he wants his life to go, he is aware of his responsibility, who knows the fun will have to end one day.
Therefore, both these acts speak volumes. Hal gets rid of formal himself,
And I think that is the most dramatic aspect of the whole movie. Making you so convincing that Falstaff and Hal is a pair of close friend, but the end reveals that they break down their relationship in this way. So amazing, is not it?
But the ending has its own premonition and reliable explanation. The most ambiguous part seems not so ambiguous, thanks to our greatest writer, Shakespeare.
Like the so-called “O. Henry-style ending”, disclosure when the movie ends the people of the psychological situation changes unexpectedly, or the fate of the hero suddenly reversed, giving audiences an unexpected result, but also be associated with real life, resulting in a unique artistic charm.
Reference:
①,② From: BBC Documentary: Shakespeare Uncovered_Jeremy Irons on the Henrys.
③ From: The movie: Henry IV
④ From: The Book: Henry IV
2 ) 「Quotes」
「I know you all and will awhile uphold the unyoked humour of your idleness. Yet herein will I imitate the sun, who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world, that, when he please again to be himself, being wanted, he may be more wondered at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him. If all the year were playing holidays, to sport would be as tedious as to work. But when they seldom come, they wished for come, and nothing pleaseth but rare accidents. So, when this loose behaviour I throw off and pay the debt I never promised, by how much better than my word I am, by so much shall I falsify men's hopes. And like bright metal on a sullen ground, my reformation, glittering o'er my fault, shall show more goodly and attract more eyes than that which hath no foil to set it off. I'll so offend, to make offence a skill, redeeming time when men think least I will.」
「What need I be so forward with him that calls not on me? Well, 'tis no matter, honour pricks me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I come on? How then? Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? No What is honour? A word. What is in that word honour? What is that honour? Air. A trim reckoning. Who hath it? He that died a'Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then. Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon. And so ends my catechism.」
「Brave Percy. Fare thee well, great heart. Ill-weaved ambition, how much art thou shrunk. When that this body did contain a spirit a kingdom for it was too small a bound, and now, two paces of the vilest earth is room enough. Adieu.」
「What need I be so forward with him that calls not on me? Well, 'tis no matter, honour pricks me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I come on? How then? Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? No What is honour? A word. What is in that word honour? What is that honour? Air. A trim reckoning. Who hath it? He that died a'Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then. Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon. And so ends my catechism.」
「Brave Percy. Fare thee well, great heart. Ill-weaved ambition, how much art thou shrunk. When that this body did contain a spirit a kingdom for it was too small a bound, and now, two paces of the vilest earth is room enough. Adieu.」
3 ) 补充一些剧中边缘人物的背景知识
个人恶趣味，想补充一下剧中出现过以及没有登场的威尔士人之间的关系。
1.Owain Glyndŵr（欧文·葛兰道厄）
欧文·葛兰道厄就是龙哥演的莫蒂默（Edmund Mortimer）的那个神叨叨的岳父，他在威尔士历史上是一个民族英雄，1400年起领导威尔士人反对英格兰的统治。他出身威尔士古老的家族，他的父亲是波伊斯（Powys）王室的的后裔，母系方面则可以追溯到德赫尤巴斯（Deheubarth）的里斯（Rhys）大王。（注：波伊斯、德赫尤巴斯以及后文提到的圭内斯都是中世纪的威尔士土著邦国。）
欧文·葛兰道厄的家系图
资料参考：wiki和Medieval Wales（A.D.Carr）
另外，还需要指出的是，历史上娶了Glyndŵr女儿的其实是埃德蒙·莫蒂默同名的叔父。
2.Owain Tudor（欧文·都铎）
这位剧中并未出现，不过个人觉得应该提一下，因为他与亨利五世颇有渊源。不过这点我们稍后再提，先介绍一下他的家世。欧文出身源于安格尔西岛的一个古老的威尔士贵族家庭，他的祖先一直侍奉圭内斯王室。他的祖父娶了德赫尤巴斯最后的男性后裔Thomas之女玛格丽特，而玛格丽特的姐姐正是欧文·葛兰道厄的母亲，所以他和葛兰道厄是有亲戚关系的，他的父亲和叔父都曾参与葛兰道厄的起义。
欧文的早年生平不详，据说他参加了阿金库尔战役，之后他为英格兰王室服务，可能在这时候他结识了王后瓦卢瓦的凯瑟琳。亨利五世于1422年8月31日驾崩，20年代后期，欧文和凯瑟琳生下了埃德蒙·都铎，再晚些时候他们秘密结婚。之后的故事大家就都知道了，欧文的孙子亨利·都铎就是亨利七世，都铎王朝的开创者。
4 ) 莎爷的小鲜肉和嬛嬛的老咸菜
刚开始的看的时候，以为都是写君王的故事，所以期待宫斗、阴谋是很正常的，结果大失所望。老外怎么这样敷衍啊，Hal这鲜肉样就一代明君了？说好的英明神武呢？几乎木有啥宫斗情节，更别提好莱坞大片中的千军万马大乱斗了，也木有什么欲迎还拒的黄袍加身，篡位也交代得极为简单（这好像上一集的情节了）。反正跟嬛嬛比简直弱！ 爆！ 了！连《冰与火之歌》里面的人物都比这复杂好么。
全剧看完，还记得什么了呢？只有那个胖得像酒桶的Falstaff，唾沫淋漓，艳压全场。还有那个场景，Falstaff听闻一起打混的小王子Hal顺承大位，连滚带爬飞奔回来沾光，然后就被君王无情地拒绝了。此时，说实话，因为Falstaff就是个丑角，小人。比较接近Sir John Falstaff福爵爷形象的其实是韦爵爷，但人家韦爵爷虽然也贪财好色且奸猾，但人家的闪光点是重情重义好不好。而这Falstaff除了插科打诨，逗人发笑之外，一点正面都木有。所以即使感受到他的失望，心里更多认同是Hal的理智，我们接受了不少这种教育嘛，要么你狠，要么你有好手腕。
然后，我就看了Simon Schama's Shakespeare。这是讲解莎剧如何成为经典的。主要是分析了很多当时的时代背景，比如莎剧之前只有奇迹剧可看，比如语言本身变得重要，比如英国正在成形，需要语言和形象的自我认同等等。这些都还很正常嘛。
然后看到一个论断，俺就震惊了。在莎爷心中，这个胖胖的Falstaff乃是英格兰的象征。你能忍受把“我们的大中国”写成一个油腔滑调的大胖子么？但据说Falstaff当时还相当受欢迎，是人民群众喜闻乐见的艺术形象，在Falstaff被拒绝一蹶不振之后，当时的女王还要求莎爷给加戏，还观众一个生龙活虎的Falstaff。
为啥呢？莎爷的戏里其实给了每个阶层和角色生动的表现，无论贩夫走卒或是王公大臣。当时有两个英格兰，一个是夏天的英格兰，小酒馆中的生活，平民阶层的生活，汁液淋漓，充满欢乐。一个是冬天的英格兰，森严，乏味，贵族阶层的生活。而Falstaff就是活力四射的那一个，那些的风趣幽默的话语就是莎翁旅行表演中各地小酒馆，旅店日常的再现，真实，亲切，带给人们欢乐。而他的食欲其实是生命力的象征。而Hal对Falstaff的拒绝其实是一种自我阉割，成为亨利五世的Hal从此再没有了之前在小酒馆的欢乐。估计这也是当时的女王心底不能说的秘密吧。
从这一点上看这也许就是东西两出戏之间的区别。甄嬛中极力表现了人性的扭曲，人在针尖密布的地上行走，虽然把一众花样的姑娘变成了一块块老姜，但以君主制为辩护，以生存为正义给了这种扭曲的合法性。而之所以风行，深得人心，因为它是对于普通人的生活而言是政治正确的，我们早就接受了这样的教训：心思缜密，偏执狂才能生存，成功即正义。而莎剧中这并不是重点，他生动的语言（虽然这点可能感受并不直接），鲜活的人物和时代风貌。不矫饰，不避讳，也不标榜，写君王的理性至上，更写出了普遍的人性，完整的人性。
这也许是莎剧这样听起来像老咸菜的经典却一直鲜嫩多汁的原因吧。
部分观点引用自Simon Schama's Shakespeare，理解莎剧的绝佳伴侣。
全剧看完，还记得什么了呢？只有那个胖得像酒桶的Falstaff，唾沫淋漓，艳压全场。还有那个场景，Falstaff听闻一起打混的小王子Hal顺承大位，连滚带爬飞奔回来沾光，然后就被君王无情地拒绝了。此时，说实话，因为Falstaff就是个丑角，小人。比较接近Sir John Falstaff福爵爷形象的其实是韦爵爷，但人家韦爵爷虽然也贪财好色且奸猾，但人家的闪光点是重情重义好不好。而这Falstaff除了插科打诨，逗人发笑之外，一点正面都木有。所以即使感受到他的失望，心里更多认同是Hal的理智，我们接受了不少这种教育嘛，要么你狠，要么你有好手腕。
然后，我就看了Simon Schama's Shakespeare。这是讲解莎剧如何成为经典的。主要是分析了很多当时的时代背景，比如莎剧之前只有奇迹剧可看，比如语言本身变得重要，比如英国正在成形，需要语言和形象的自我认同等等。这些都还很正常嘛。
然后看到一个论断，俺就震惊了。在莎爷心中，这个胖胖的Falstaff乃是英格兰的象征。你能忍受把“我们的大中国”写成一个油腔滑调的大胖子么？但据说Falstaff当时还相当受欢迎，是人民群众喜闻乐见的艺术形象，在Falstaff被拒绝一蹶不振之后，当时的女王还要求莎爷给加戏，还观众一个生龙活虎的Falstaff。
为啥呢？莎爷的戏里其实给了每个阶层和角色生动的表现，无论贩夫走卒或是王公大臣。当时有两个英格兰，一个是夏天的英格兰，小酒馆中的生活，平民阶层的生活，汁液淋漓，充满欢乐。一个是冬天的英格兰，森严，乏味，贵族阶层的生活。而Falstaff就是活力四射的那一个，那些的风趣幽默的话语就是莎翁旅行表演中各地小酒馆，旅店日常的再现，真实，亲切，带给人们欢乐。而他的食欲其实是生命力的象征。而Hal对Falstaff的拒绝其实是一种自我阉割，成为亨利五世的Hal从此再没有了之前在小酒馆的欢乐。估计这也是当时的女王心底不能说的秘密吧。
从这一点上看这也许就是东西两出戏之间的区别。甄嬛中极力表现了人性的扭曲，人在针尖密布的地上行走，虽然把一众花样的姑娘变成了一块块老姜，但以君主制为辩护，以生存为正义给了这种扭曲的合法性。而之所以风行，深得人心，因为它是对于普通人的生活而言是政治正确的，我们早就接受了这样的教训：心思缜密，偏执狂才能生存，成功即正义。而莎剧中这并不是重点，他生动的语言（虽然这点可能感受并不直接），鲜活的人物和时代风貌。不矫饰，不避讳，也不标榜，写君王的理性至上，更写出了普遍的人性，完整的人性。
这也许是莎剧这样听起来像老咸菜的经典却一直鲜嫩多汁的原因吧。
部分观点引用自Simon Schama's Shakespeare，理解莎剧的绝佳伴侣。
5 ) 亨利四世
骑士、爵士、领主、亲王、国王、荣誉，又有几个是真实的，又有几个是吃人不吐骨头的，不过是空话而已。
老杰克爵士是这部剧里最出彩的角色了，如同上部的理查。这段独白令人印象深刻。“我命数未尽，何必急着赴死。唉没关系，我是为荣誉而战。可若我主动迎战，荣誉却要我牺牲，那该如何？名誉能重接断骨吗？不能。断臂呢？也不能。或是抚平伤口的痛处？还是不能。荣誉一点医术都不懂吧？不懂。荣誉是什么？两个字。这两个字又包含了什么？空话而已，聪明的算计。谁拥有它？那些礼拜三战死的人。他们能感受到荣耀吗？不能。他们能听到赞誉吗？不能。所以荣誉是感知不到的，对死人来说。但活人不能享受荣誉吗？不能。为什么？因为生者必遭人污蔑和诽谤。所以我不要荣誉了。荣誉只不过是死人的纹盾。就让我想到这吧。”
6 ) [Henry IV 中 Prince Hal 的独白]
太喜欢这段独白.试着翻了一个.
参考了好几个其他版本的翻译也不知翻得有没有错.剧中抖森走在小巷里,配乐加上声音,太感人了.
I know you all, and will awhile uphold the unyoked humour of your idleness. Yet herein will I imitate the sun who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world, that when he please again to be himself, being wanted, he may be more wondered at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him.
If all the year were playing holidays to sports would be as tedious as to work. But when they seldom come, they wished for come, and nothing pleaseth but rare accidents. So, when this loose behaviour I throw off and pay the debt I never promised, by how much better than my word I am, by so much shall I falsify men's hopes. And like bright metal on a sullen ground, my reformation, glittering o'er my fault, shall show more goodly and attract more eyes than that which hath no foil to se it off.
I'll so offend ,to make offence a skill, redeeming time when men think least I will.
我把你们这些人都看透了，我会暂时容忍你们这种浅薄无趣的幽默。
我会效仿太阳，它可以容忍蔓延的乌云遮蔽它洒向世间的光辉，
但当他想要再次显现真实的自己时，它会冲破那些令它窒息的污浊的雾霾，
使人们感受到对它前所未有的需要，从而对它发出由衷的赞叹。
如果终年在游戏中度过，那游戏也会变得像工作一般令人生厌。
世间的事情都是这样，
唯有偶尔为之，才会使人感到饱经等待的惬意，
唯有不期而遇，才会使人感到发自内心的惊喜。
所以，当我抛弃了这些放荡的行为，
我会担起那些本该由我承担的，我从未承诺过要担起的重担，
向人们证明我并不像我平日表现出的那般荒唐，
我的作为会远远超出他们对我的期望。
像是了无生气的大地上发出耀眼光芒的金属，
我的洗心革面，会被以往的错误衬托得格外令人动容，
使我显得比那些从未沉沦过的人更加卓越。
我把肆意妄为当做我的手段，
当所有人都对我绝望了的时候，
我会让他们看到力挽狂澜，洗心革面的我。
参考了好几个其他版本的翻译也不知翻得有没有错.剧中抖森走在小巷里,配乐加上声音,太感人了.
I know you all, and will awhile uphold the unyoked humour of your idleness. Yet herein will I imitate the sun who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world, that when he please again to be himself, being wanted, he may be more wondered at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him.
If all the year were playing holidays to sports would be as tedious as to work. But when they seldom come, they wished for come, and nothing pleaseth but rare accidents. So, when this loose behaviour I throw off and pay the debt I never promised, by how much better than my word I am, by so much shall I falsify men's hopes. And like bright metal on a sullen ground, my reformation, glittering o'er my fault, shall show more goodly and attract more eyes than that which hath no foil to se it off.
I'll so offend ,to make offence a skill, redeeming time when men think least I will.
我把你们这些人都看透了，我会暂时容忍你们这种浅薄无趣的幽默。
我会效仿太阳，它可以容忍蔓延的乌云遮蔽它洒向世间的光辉，
但当他想要再次显现真实的自己时，它会冲破那些令它窒息的污浊的雾霾，
使人们感受到对它前所未有的需要，从而对它发出由衷的赞叹。
如果终年在游戏中度过，那游戏也会变得像工作一般令人生厌。
世间的事情都是这样，
唯有偶尔为之，才会使人感到饱经等待的惬意，
唯有不期而遇，才会使人感到发自内心的惊喜。
所以，当我抛弃了这些放荡的行为，
我会担起那些本该由我承担的，我从未承诺过要担起的重担，
向人们证明我并不像我平日表现出的那般荒唐，
我的作为会远远超出他们对我的期望。
像是了无生气的大地上发出耀眼光芒的金属，
我的洗心革面，会被以往的错误衬托得格外令人动容，
使我显得比那些从未沉沦过的人更加卓越。
我把肆意妄为当做我的手段，
当所有人都对我绝望了的时候，
我会让他们看到力挽狂澜，洗心革面的我。
开场抖森自白就立马想到My Own Private Idaho。。没想到Idaho后面的桥段也是来自这部戏（没文化真可怕），稍出戏。。抖森学铁叔那段太棒了！！这集演员都大爱
比亨五好看，但为什么还都是抖森...铁叔那凝聚一生武力值的一巴掌拯救失足少年（不对）
覺得湯抖森很厲害，剛演完復仇者這種票房大片一轉身就能收心演BBC迷你劇，還是不改編的莎劇。一夜成名似乎完全沒能影響到他。不僅是抖森，英國的演員都好cultural，名利雙收的電影方演罷，立刻就跑去演話劇甚至錄廣播劇的都有。似乎同美國演員有著某種本質上的區別。
thor的弟弟这部片子里面卖相倒蛮好的
在我看来很不错。Irons的表演充满张力，把亨四内心的纠结和挣扎表现得非常生动。Hotspur的粗俗和柔情，Falstaff的荒谬和口蜜腹剑，都演绎得非常完美。在这种情况下其实对Hidddleston的挑战很大。抖森在第一部分基本都是本色出演，念白的功力很棒，但总摆脱不了抖森本人的模子。略可惜。
铁叔背对镜头都能感受到的霸气
莎士比亚与BBC结合，近乎完美
果断第一时间撸了生肉,完全不闷,感觉剧本改编度好过理查二世.Hal在酒馆胡闹模仿亨四的那场戏抖森抓住了好多铁叔的特点,赞一个!父子那场戏之后,I have all the Prince Hal feelings!! TAT其实我主要想说的是,抖森无论一脸酒还是一脸血都真是holy-mother-of-god-i-can't-freaking-breathe hot！
抖森前半部分全程卖萌，整体片子比理查活泼多了啊，后半程农民械斗槽点无限。_(:з」∠)_抖森抖森【鼻血
让Jeremy Irons演哼四有一个致命的BUG，揍是哼四老年比青壮年时期头发还多，这不科学！！！
开星盘对照着看剧是很有意思的事。亨利五世抖森少年混迹市井，后立下功绩。正对应日生人的金秤11和10R水处10的阶段行运。可惜命主火星受6/8宫主、宫内星影响严重。土蟹陷8刑6R/8R月蟹冲命/6R刑命，走8R大限+命主火小限时得痢疾横死。理查德二世演出了月鱼合上升的精神
铁叔一出来我就想给他跪下！虽然时间真是太短了QAQ。抖森的小皮衣加深V真惊艳（话说当时真这么穿的么？←文盲）。战场的感觉还是太cheap但是基友纷纷表示符合史实_(:з」∠)_ 看到Julie Walters好开心！
再叹一遍文盲~！拍得挺好的~~铁叔有范儿啊。。。。（终于明白为何豆瓣上抖森粉丝如此之多了、。。很符合豆瓣各种男女青年审美喜好 哈哈！！！）
比理查二世改编力度大（其实也就是混了一下画面_(:3」∠)_理查完全就是给小本炫技用的）这版的福斯塔夫好悲伤…我要是亲王怎么会被逗笑（亲王被抖森演成哲学家了）槽点好多嘛霍兹波演得超好，苏格兰口音和威尔士语躺枪，大小姐你好适合演这种冷脸又偷偷horny，Julie和Maxine都好会演酒馆女郎【写不完！
亨四1一直是我最爱的莎翁剧之一。JI叔的声线永远无可替代，而且他的王冠质感稍微好点，比较不像小本那顶义乌产的了…falstaff这一角我的唯一最爱果然还是只有roger allam，那种演出才叫收放自如，不知还能再看一次不…战争场面确实看起来好穷，就差锄头扁担的对打了…说到最后对着JI叔的脸还是打了五星
偶尔游戏才算惬意
比理查二世更有趣，两代陛下都熠熠生辉！还有胖乎乎的大胡子~
因为太喜欢Hal所以顺带萌了抖森？酒馆那几场戏看的心花怒放啊。所以之前不喜欢他完全是因为洛基的人设吧绝对是吧……总体很high，毕竟是1 Henry IV嘛 >< 不过后面打仗那场面不得不感叹BBC果然预算不足~
雷神的弟弟粗线= =+~~~
什么平复叛乱啊！什么宫廷斗争啊！WHO CARES啊？！！！